A study by a group affiliated with Columbia University shows the media was more negative in its coverage of Bush during the runup to the election. But note that Fox was included in the study. What would the figures have looked like had Fox not been included? Also, as in any field like the news, there are people with integrity. What would the results of this study been had Fox and news outlets that were not overly biased been ecluded. The answer demonstrates the clear bias against Bush in the election season. And why exactly were they so biased? Because John Kerry had shown himself to be such a capable leader of this country? Give me a break!

Right now our nation's continued existence depends absolutely on the media getting its act together and eliminating the bias that pervades the institution.

Maybe that's a bit strong. We may be able to survive a bias media. But we'll have to put them out of business to do it.